CodexBloom - Programming Q&A Platform

Calculating the Correct Size of a Structure Array with Flexible Member in C

๐Ÿ‘€ Views: 54 ๐Ÿ’ฌ Answers: 1 ๐Ÿ“… Created: 2025-07-14
C memory-management structures

I'm getting frustrated with I've been struggling with this for a few days now and could really use some help. I've searched everywhere and can't find a clear answer. I'm working with a structure that contains a flexible array member, and I'm running into a question when trying to calculate the size of an array of these structures. My struct looks like this: ```c typedef struct { size_t count; int values[]; } IntArray; ``` I want to create multiple instances of `IntArray`, and I'm dynamically allocating enough memory to include the flexible member. However, I keep working with an scenario when I attempt to access the `values` array in the second instance. Hereโ€™s how Iโ€™m allocating memory: ```c IntArray *create_array(size_t count) { IntArray *array = malloc(sizeof(IntArray) + (count - 1) * sizeof(int)); if (!array) return NULL; array->count = count; return array; } ``` When I call `create_array(5)` and then attempt to set values in the first instance like so: ```c IntArray *array1 = create_array(5); for (size_t i = 0; i < array1->count; i++) { array1->values[i] = i * 10; } ``` I can correctly retrieve those values. But when I create a second instance with `IntArray *array2 = create_array(3);` and try to access `array2->values[0]`, I get a segmentation fault. Hereโ€™s the code snippet for that: ```c IntArray *array2 = create_array(3); if (array2) { printf("First value: %d\n", array2->values[0]); // Segmentation fault here } ``` I've double-checked the size calculations, and I believe Iโ€™m allocating the right amount of memory relative to the count parameter. Am I missing something in how I'm handling the flexible array member? Iโ€™m using GCC version 11.2.0, and I've also tried running it with Address Sanitizer, but no additional issues were reported. What am I doing wrong? How would you solve this? I'm working on a application that needs to handle this. What's the best practice here? What am I doing wrong? What's the correct way to implement this?