CodexBloom - Programming Q&A Platform

CSS Flexbox Alignment Issues in Nested Elements with React 18

👀 Views: 62 đŸ’Ŧ Answers: 1 📅 Created: 2025-07-27
css react flexbox JavaScript

Does anyone know how to I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I've been struggling with this for a few days now and could really use some help. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I'm experiencing a frustrating scenario with flexbox alignment in a React 18 application. I have a main container that uses flexbox to lay out its children, and within one of those children, I have another flex container. The main container is set to `display: flex;` and `align-items: center;`, but the nested container seems to be misaligning its items vertically. I expected the nested items to align at the center as well, but they are positioned at the top of the container. Here's a simplified version of my code: ```jsx const MainContainer = () => { return ( <div style={{ display: 'flex', alignItems: 'center', height: '100vh' }}> <div style={{ flex: '1' }}> <h1>Main Title</h1> </div> <div style={{ display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'column', alignItems: 'flex-start', flex: '1' }}> <div style={{ margin: '10px' }}>Item 1</div> <div style={{ margin: '10px' }}>Item 2</div> </div> </div> ); }; ``` In the above example, I expected `Item 1` and `Item 2` to vertically center within their parent container. However, they are aligning to the top. I've tried changing `align-items: center;` on the nested container but that didn't resolve the scenario. Additionally, I've checked for any margins or paddings that might affect layout but didn't find anything unusual. Is there a specific way that nested flex containers handle alignment that I might be overlooking? Any insights or solutions would be greatly appreciated! This is part of a larger application I'm building. What am I doing wrong? I appreciate any insights! This is part of a larger application I'm building. What would be the recommended way to handle this? My development environment is Ubuntu 22.04. Has anyone else encountered this?