CodexBloom - Programming Q&A Platform

implementing Array Destructuring in React State Updates Returning Undefined

πŸ‘€ Views: 66 πŸ’¬ Answers: 1 πŸ“… Created: 2025-08-21
react arrays state-management javascript

I'm stuck on something that should probably be simple. I'm trying to update the state in my React component using array destructuring, but I'm running into a strange scenario where the updated state is returning `undefined` when I attempt to access it. I'm using React 17.0.2 and the state is initialized as an array. Here's a simplified example of my code: ```javascript import React, { useState } from 'react'; const MyComponent = () => { const [items, setItems] = useState(['apple', 'banana', 'cherry']); const updateItem = (index, newItem) => { const newItems = [...items]; newItems[index] = newItem; setItems(newItems); }; const handleChange = (index) => { updateItem(index, null); // Intentionally passing null to simulate an scenario }; console.log(items[1]); // Should log 'banana' return ( <div> {items.map((item, index) => ( <div key={index}> {item} <button onClick={() => handleChange(index)}>Change</button> </div> ))} </div> ); }; export default MyComponent; ``` The intention is to replace an item in the array with `null` temporarily for testing. However, when I log `items[1]`, sometimes it logs `undefined` instead of the expected `banana`, particularly after multiple updates. I have made sure that the index passed to `updateItem` is valid, and I even added a check before I set the state. I've considered using the functional update form of `setItems`, but I still need to pin down why the state seems inconsistent. Here’s an example of what I tried: ```javascript setItems(prevItems => { const newItems = [...prevItems]; newItems[index] = newItem; return newItems; }); ``` This still leads to the same scenario. Is this a common pitfall with React's state updates using array destructuring, or am I missing something fundamental? Any insights would be greatly appreciated! My development environment is macOS. Am I missing something obvious?