👀 Views: 359 💬 Answers: 1 📅 Created: 2025-10-17

android accessibility wcag third-party kotlin

I'm attempting to set up I'm following best practices but While integrating a third-party library into our Android app, particularly one that handles media playback, I am focused on ensuring full WCAG compliance... Accessibility is crucial for our user base, and I want to ensure that screen reader functionality is seamless. The library documentation suggests that it follows standard practices, but I'm not entirely convinced it meets the necessary guidelines. I've already started by implementing `AccessibilityDelegate` to override certain behaviors. For instance, I have this setup: ```kotlin class CustomPlayerView(context: Context) : FrameLayout(context) { init { this.accessibilityDelegate = object : View.AccessibilityDelegate() { override fun onInitializeAccessibilityNodeInfo(v: View, info: AccessibilityNodeInfo) { super.onInitializeAccessibilityNodeInfo(v, info) info.contentDescription = "Media player controls" } } } } ``` However, there are still challenges with focus navigation when the media controls are displayed. The standard controls provided by the library do not seem to respond to keyboard events consistently, which is a big concern. I've tried applying `requestFocus()` in various lifecycle methods, but it doesn't seem to have the desired effect. Here's a snippet that demonstrates my current attempt: ```kotlin override fun onAttachedToWindow() { super.onAttachedToWindow() playButton.setOnClickListener { // Play functionality requestFocus() // Trying to manage focus here } } ``` I've also explored alternatives like using `AccessibilityService` to help manage focus, but the integration complexity increases. Given the limited support for this particular third-party library, I'm curious if anyone has suggestions on best practices or specific patterns to enforce accessibility compliance when dealing with external components. Additionally, I've dived into Android's Accessibility Testing tools, but the results have been less than conclusive. The automated tests often return false negatives or positives, which adds to the confusion. Does anyone have experience with a similar integration or specific tests to ensure accessibility standards are met? Any insights into improving the accessibility of the library's components while keeping user experience intact would be greatly appreciated. This is part of a larger REST API I'm building. What would be the recommended way to handle this? This is for a microservice running on Linux.