CodexBloom - Programming Q&A Platform

Issues with Efficiently Managing Large Collections in C# Using LINQ and Parallelism

👀 Views: 95 đŸ’Ŧ Answers: 1 📅 Created: 2025-06-07
LINQ parallel-processing performance C#

I'm currently working with a large collection of objects (around 1 million entries) where each entry is a complex type containing several properties. My goal is to filter and transform this data efficiently using LINQ and parallel processing to improve performance. However, I'm running into issues with performance drops and memory consumption when I attempt to use `AsParallel()` in conjunction with `Select()`. For instance, when I try this code: ```csharp using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Threading.Tasks; public class DataItem { public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public double Value { get; set; } } public class Program { public static void Main() { List<DataItem> items = GetData(); // Assume this fetches 1 million DataItems var result = items.AsParallel() .Where(item => item.Value > 100) .Select(item => new { item.Id, item.Name }); foreach (var r in result) { Console.WriteLine(r); } } } ``` While the LINQ query seems straightforward, I'm encountering exceptions intermittently, such as `System.OutOfMemoryException`, especially when the filtering condition is too broad. Additionally, when I try to run this operation on a lower-spec machine, I receive timeouts or significant delays in processing. I've tried tweaking the degree of parallelism by using `WithDegreeOfParallelism(4)` but that doesn't seem to help much. I'm also aware that using `AsParallel()` can lead to issues with thread safety. Is there a recommended way to efficiently manage large collections in C# without encountering these performance and memory issues? Could there be a better alternative to using `AsParallel()` or any specific optimizations that I can apply?