CodexBloom - Programming Q&A Platform

AWS CodeDeploy scenarios to Deploy with 'Invalid AppSpec file' scenarios Despite Correct YAML Formatting

šŸ‘€ Views: 91 šŸ’¬ Answers: 1 šŸ“… Created: 2025-06-09
aws codedeploy yaml nodejs YAML

I'm testing a new approach and I'm getting frustrated with I'm stuck on something that should probably be simple... Hey everyone, I'm running into an issue that's driving me crazy... I'm trying to deploy my Node.js application using AWS CodeDeploy, but I'm working with an behavior that states 'Invalid AppSpec file' during the deployment process. I've double-checked the AppSpec file, which is in YAML format, and I need to identify any syntax issues. Here's a snippet of my AppSpec file: ```yaml version: 0.0 os: linux files: - source: / destination: /var/www/myapp hooks: AfterInstall: - location: scripts/install_dependencies.sh timeout: 300 runas: root onFailure: CONTINUE ``` When I run the deployment, I receive the following behavior message: `want to deploy because the AppSpec file is invalid: Invalid YAML syntax`. I've validated my YAML file using several online validators, and they all confirm the syntax is correct. Additionally, I have set the permissions for the `scripts/install_dependencies.sh` file to be executable. In my `appspec.yml`, I've ensured that the file paths are relative to the root of my application bundle. I've tried removing the `timeout` and `runas` attributes from the hooks section to see if that resolves the scenario, but the same behavior continues. I’m using the AWS CLI version 2.4.0 for deployment. Any advice on what might be causing this behavior or how to debug it further would be greatly appreciated. Has anyone else faced a similar scenario, and what steps did you take to resolve it? I'm working on a CLI tool that needs to handle this. What's the best practice here? I'm coming from a different tech stack and learning Yaml. Am I missing something obvious? This is happening in both development and production on macOS. I'm open to any suggestions. I'm working on a mobile app that needs to handle this. Is there a better approach?