CodexBloom - Programming Q&A Platform

C# - Using ValueTask for Asynchronous Methods but Facing Performance Issues in High-Frequency Calls

👀 Views: 35 đŸ’Ŧ Answers: 1 📅 Created: 2025-06-17
c# async-await performance ValueTask C#

I'm working through a tutorial and I'm working on a project and hit a roadblock. I need some guidance on I'm working on a high-performance C# application where I need to make frequent asynchronous calls to a method that processes some data... I recently started returning `ValueTask<T>` instead of `Task<T>` to reduce allocations, but I've noticed that I'm facing performance issues when these methods are called in rapid succession. The methods involved are using `await` internally for I/O operations, and I expected that `ValueTask` would help reduce memory pressure. Here's a simplified version of what I have right now: ```csharp public class DataProcessor { public async ValueTask<string> ProcessDataAsync(string input) { await Task.Delay(50); // Simulating I/O return input.ToUpper(); } } ``` I'm calling this method in a loop: ```csharp public class Program { public async Task RunAsync() { var processor = new DataProcessor(); var tasks = new List<ValueTask<string>>(); for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { tasks.Add(processor.ProcessDataAsync("test" + i)); } var results = await Task.WhenAll(tasks); } } ``` Despite using `ValueTask`, I'm encountering issues with `OutOfMemoryException` during execution. Profiling the application shows that many allocations are happening, which is not what I expected when switching to `ValueTask`. I've tried switching back to `Task<T>`, and the memory usage seems much more manageable. Is there something I'm missing about the lifecycle or proper usage of `ValueTask` in high-frequency scenarios? How should I be managing these calls to minimize allocations effectively? This is for a microservice running on macOS. Any suggestions would be helpful. Cheers for any assistance!