👀 Views: 317 💬 Answers: 1 📅 Created: 2025-06-30

selenium webdriver python Python

I'm working on a project and hit a roadblock. Could someone explain I'm optimizing some code but I'm working with an scenario with Selenium WebDriver when testing a dynamic Angular application..... The question arises with elements that take different amounts of time to load based on varying user interactions. I have tried using both `WebDriverWait` and `ExpectedConditions` for waiting on specific elements, but it doesn't seem to resolve the scenario consistently. For instance, I have the following code snippet: ```python from selenium import webdriver from selenium.webdriver.common.by import By from selenium.webdriver.support.ui import WebDriverWait from selenium.webdriver.support import expected_conditions as EC # Initialize the Chrome driver driver = webdriver.Chrome() # Open the target page driver.get('http://example-angular-app.com') # Attempt to wait for an element that sometimes loads slowly try: element = WebDriverWait(driver, 10).until( EC.presence_of_element_located((By.ID, 'dynamic-element')) ) element.click() except Exception as e: print(f'behavior: {e}') finally: driver.quit() ``` In some cases, this works fine, but other times I encounter the behavior, `TimeoutException: Message: 240.0 seconds timeout expired`, indicating that the wait has exceeded the specified time. I even tried increasing the wait time to see if that would help, but the variability in loading times seems to play a important role. Additionally, I've considered using `FluentWait`, but I'm unsure how to apply it effectively in this situation. Any recommendations on best practices for handling unpredictable loading times in dynamic web applications with Selenium? What approaches can I take to ensure that I reliably interact with these elements without running into timeout issues? What's the best practice here? My development environment is macOS. Has anyone else encountered this? Has anyone else encountered this? This is my first time working with Python 3.9. Am I missing something obvious?